Nyaa archive 1571210
[HachiRoku] Chihayafuru 2 (BD 1080p Hi10 FLAC)
Saved on 2022-12-05 09:00:39. This copy includes the description and comments available at capture.
Description
| Track | Source |
|---|---|
| Video | [Liuyun&VCB-Studio&ANK-Raws] |
| Audio Track 1 | [Liuyun&VCB-Studio&ANK-Raws] (Japanese 2.0 FLAC 24-bit) |
| Subtitle Track 1 | Full Subtitles [Commie] (eng) |
| Chapters | [MK] |
A sub-only mux featuring encodes sourced from MK's release and Commie subtitles. The script was just resampled, otherwise unmodified. This release is an update to current releases using Commie's BD batch, as it features significant updates. I opted to exclude the dub, as creating a proper Signs & Songs track would require considerable effort, and I don't care about dubs enough to put it in. I could've included an incorrect track like Yuki did for his release of the first season, yet chose not to. If you'd like to watch the dub, I recommend MK's releases for both seasons.
Comments 27
San
wat
It's a requested mux from sneedex. I just want a spot.
its either truehd or opus
stop with this FLAC bulllshit
thanks for the release
but le epic archival release every 6 months
@DeathStroke, TrueHD has the same compression as FLAC, probably a little worse. It's only useful for surround audio as it can be bitstreamed to receivers. Opus degrades audio so I don't use it. And you're welcome.
@Gnome, all my release are up to archival standards.
where opus?
Did commie's updated BD batch fix all the problems that MK originally corrected though?
@hchcsen, this is a good encode, i.e. better than source.
@Interruptor, no Opus on my releases.
is this some kind of bad joke i just don't understand?
yes it is better than source but a encode is not the lossless quality and therefore not up to actual archival "standards"
Archival standards aren't just Remuxes.
no it is specifically lossless material as close to the original shape as possible hence it would actually be a BDMV since that is a 1 to 1 copy of the original material
@HachiRoku but OPUS is better. Why would you not use that? You are already using a lossy codec through the video.
How is Opus better? And don't capitalize it, it's not an acronym like FLAC.
Because it is virtually transparent and you cannot prove otherwise. In fact, no one has ever done that on this site. An ABX test would suffice. You can find it online. Show me the results that you can discern flac from OPUS reliably and then I'll believe you.
they've already done 3 "abx tests" and faked 2 of them LMAO
absolute state of flactards...
Well, the one that wasn't fake was 192kHz/24-bit FLAC vs Opus 192kbps and I succeeded.
HachiRokuNiSanKyu
i'm aorry but i can't help you with tsing eva. i have some aegi eperience but i'm tied up with my scanlarion group
I don't remember asking you but any help would be welcome.
you literally did lmao
still, i can't.
This popcorn needs more butter.