Nyaa archive 1472725
[Lulu] Tonikaku Kawaii [BD 1080p HEVC][FLAC][AAC][Dual-Audio] | TONIKAWA: Over the Moon For You
Saved on 2026-09-18 00:23:01. This copy includes the description and comments available at capture.
Description
| Sources | ||
|---|---|---|
| Video | [sam] | |
| Audio Track 1 | [sam] (Japanese 2.0 FLAC) | |
| Audio Track 2 | [Bunny-Apocalypse] (English 2.0 AAC) | |
| Subtitle Track 1 | Full Subtitles [GHS] (en) | |
| Subtitle Track 2 | Signs/Songs (en) | |
| Mediainfo | https://pastebin.com/42dTY6fV |
Notes: Dual audio mux featuring [GHS] release with accompanying signs/songs track. Just fixed few typos. Will update the dub when USBD comes out.
If there are any issues you find with this release or points for improvement, post it in the comments.
Please seed my releases for as long as possible since I don’t have a seedbox.
Comments 14
why are there never any screenshots or comparisons for sam encodes
show me i can trust them
happy new year and thanks
@tonikaku why not make yourself? Barely takes 5 minutes unless you have shit internet.
it's not like there's much choice for this series anyway
sam wins by default
@everyone Happy New Year. Wish you all the best for next season. :)
@Tonikaku
I trust what seadex has to say about sam
Nice
just list some extensive filter chain you used in your description and people will instantly think you know what you're doing. no comparison needed. bonus if you use hevc.
seriously though, i don't think i've ever seen a comparison of any of sam's encodes.
https://slow.pics/c/K9lr6AY3 comp between BDMV, sam, Reza and UCCUSS for Bookworm
(it's the only one I remember seeing)
*appreciation
I can’t even tell you how many times I have seen X person ask which video is better only for Y person to reply its a certain group/encoder because they are reputable without providing any actual comps, reasons or facts why its better.
Whats even funnier is half the people can’t even see the difference and just ask best release to sound authentic, only to blindly believe what other people tell them.
Its fine to ask for opinions like if all the encodes are kinda bad and have their own issues so you want to get insights, but at the end of the day its best to use your own eyes.
i dunno, i can usually tell from most comparisons. problem is they need to actually exist. it's one thing to have a rule of thumb about which encoders are good, but to specifically recommend encoder x for anime y with no comparison seems stupid. i've even seen seadex switch an encode i actually put some effort into over to a release by a "known" good encoder the day it was released with no comparison linked. lmao.
UCCUSS: disqualified due to line darkening
Reza: disqualified due to detail loss in https://slow.pics/c/GE6dZTTg (denoising? aq-strength=0.68?)
[sam] is the last man standing.
EDIT: seadex agrees with me, yay
pretty sure every UCCUSS encode uses line darkening and sucks shit. dunno why people ever use them for remuxes.