[naiyas] Kuma Kuma Kuma Bear - 04 [WebRip 1080p HEVC-10bit AAC]v2[GJM + LoliHouse]

Lol why are you even doing this. This shit is pointless. GJM’s video quality is superior to this, as they have an encoder that knows what their doing. Just because it’s HEVC doesn’t mean it’s better. The encoding settings for this WEBRip are hot garbage. crf-21? Already? Spare me the picture. This is just like any other mini-encode of a WEBRip on Nyaa. Mark this as a remake before the mods do this shit for you.

just look at side by side oh really you say crf 21 just look the media video first before saying, does not always judge file size probably you say crf 21 cuz of file size smaller @Ingenioussubs
for the picture that capture in fast motion scene lol

low crf doesn't means quality at all time.some times it bloats file if the encoder not know what he is doing

ok Download GJM and compare it yourself

Oh wow, my bad. It's actually crf-18. Doesn't matter though. The encoding settings are terrible even with a lower crf. Anyhow, mark this as a remake as the mods keep doing it for you.

Dunno why you guys are shittalking LoliHouse. They do decent encodes with fixed aliasing, debanding and appropriate bitrate.
They had the best encodes as Vinland Saga was airing.

@Ingenioussubs do you watched it or just talking without getting review it frame by frame

@naiyas First of all It's good But I wouldn't say it's close to GJM as It's overly debanded & as a result loss of details as some point.Also in some dark scenes when loli debanded it highly there was white dots created along the lines.For ex. Two pics taken from same frame where the hair's white line is less showing in loli
Comp:- https://slow.pics/c/zHX1yg4T

Lolihouse is worse but GJM ain't great either. I'd just look elsewhere (or get GJM, it's probably the best option)

my testing based is the fast action scene most of the mini encode failed in situation you'll see glitching all over in place
i would say it is good in overall for banding the yeah some point become soften the details cuz of the banding

@SeaSmoke i've downloaded everything in video x265 10 for this, so for this is best version you've got in x265 i've tested in various way

GJM is just 440mb, is there any reason to do a omegasmol release anyway? Even if you have to, you'll get better results by encoding it yourself, probably.

My point is calling this close to GJM is what's invalid.I just looked that encoding setting is not good as stated above
BTW do what you want.Don't bother what I said anyway as long as it's not against the rules

yeah just 440mb, it is good to have alternative a smaller one in good encode in mini but don't just say a worse encode, mini encode have always a downside

@saringan_slayer at normal viewing experience it is close to GJM [PSNR]

What is normal viewing anyway. It's what You are implying on your biases

@saringan_slayer you watched a video play and pause and zoom it.

Do you think I didn't after giving you that comp & explained the thing presents in the file?

you watched a video play and pause and zoom it.

Epic statement. That’s the definition of a comparison. He also gave his reasons. Not like I care what you’re doing, but saying it’s the same as GJM is a lie in itself. Yours is a mini-encode, so it’s expected to look like that. Only thing I care about is the remake tag. Not going to comment further, as more dumb reasoning will occur.

This is stuff which a normal person would notice during playback lol

If you want awesome comp.
@Ingenioussubs
Colour banding
Noise grain
Chroma
Colour depth
Motion blur
lightning artifacts
How dark scene reacting to lights elements
PSNR

If you know that much then it should be clear to you that how down grade this loli video of yours compare to GJM

it's like 50/50 comparison

It's not even close at all.even it's half of it even then it won't be called close to GJM

i would say half close [the only thing that raised my temper that could 'shity encode & garbage"

There is nothing to raise the temper when it's not your encode.some statements are true here

that's a form of shit talking toward the uploader

Well, the encode is worse. So the shit talk was to be expected I guess.

@SeaSmoke this is best? out of the worst there.

this is the 30th comment