[Judas] Noragami (Seasons 1-2 + OADs) [BD 1080p][HEVC x265 10bit][Dual-Audio][Eng-Subs] (Aragoto) (Batch)

Thanks

THANKS FOR THIS BATCH

tyvm

thanks

Thanks

Did you guys forgot to mux the fonts? That's not how the dialogue looks.

that is great

NOT FIRST;-; THANKS!!!!!

Did you guys descale this. Are you sure you got the right kernel,terrible haloing in some scenes https://slow.pics/c/2q2hBTPD

Also some of the details are completely gone https://slow.pics/c/B7SkmkvP also checked with other minis in this size range and only happens with yours.

Also fonts are missing.

Are you planning to do batches of Spring shows that aren't listed in your WIP-channel? Thanks.

@KintokiSakata Is that from the main show or OADs?

Thanks, Judas

Apparently the fonts didn't get muxed, I will release a v2 with them

@SeaSmoke 1st episode

I know that dunking on Judas is fun and all, and I love doing it myself, but fabricating fake comparison shots is a new low, @KintokiSakata. I hate having to defend mini-encode groups, but sincerely; consider the noose. Doing that kinda shit just makes you a garbage person.

Yeah, this encode is from before I joined, but I do have the script EoE used for it and it doesn't have awarp in it, and the comp you posted is clearly warped. I hope you didn't mark Moozzi as Judas and posted that comp here just to shit on it.

LightArrowsEXE has taken his gloves off now go get em ? and we have a new challenger in SeaSmoke..... grabs popcorn.

@LightArrowsEXE i made a mistake. Seems i like the screens got mixed up. The judas one is the 1st one, mistakes happen. I took screens from multiple encodes amd posted. Honestly should have given it more time and for that i apologize. Also telling someone to kill themselves makes you less than a person so please don't preach about what is a garbage person to others because you clearly are one.

@judas Sorry for this. Was just asking. Everything other than the fonts are great in this encode thanks.

@everyone ignore my post above.

@SeaSmoke seems i took pic from moozzi one thanks. Should have figured out its moozzi from awarp. Sorry for the mistake. Encode looks great this time.

Are you sure? Seems Moozzi claims his release is unfiltered.

@LightArrowsEXE i am not at home right now. Will check whose encode it was when i return.

Sure, take your sweet time to come up with a good excuse. We'll be waiting.

@LightArrowsEXE
1)who is "we" are you a part of judas now?

2. what would i get from fabricating screens. Its not like this was encoded by seasmoke who you all claim i have agenda against.

3)if its encoded by EoE then i apologize greatly i know he is a great encoder and puts a lot of time in all this. Sorry fir the mistake once again. It was an honest mistake.

if its encoded by EoE then i apologize

why do I have a feeling that you only commented because you thought I was one of the guys working on this?
P.S I was, but not on the main series, that's 100% EoE

@SeaSmoke you feel wrong i commented only because i saw problems with encode. For example your shaman king is good for size so i didn't comment. Idc who worked on that. Admitedly i made a mistake with the comparison and for that i have apologized many times obviously.

There's no font in mkv files, sad.

1. Nope, but having a blast seeing you backtrack with the gang in their server.
2. Smearing groups you don't like. Considering you've shown comparisons where there's more issues present than in the actual video before, you certainly appear to either have an issue with Judas (and SeaSmoke's releases specifically), or are incompetent at comparing releases. Fix your shit or stop spouting shit. It should be super easy to show that Judas is worse than most good encodes without needing to make their release look even worse. Oh also, you can also stop lurking in the aforementioned server. Makes things easier on us.
3. Sucking EoE's dick won't make you seem like any less of a fool in this situation, FYI. Just makes you look more desperate to save face.

1)lmao so yea "gang"

2)well you can check for yourself that is 100% correct. One is cbm and other is seasmoke both taken using vsedit so lossless. I don't know why your screens are different maybe you looked at some other encode.

3)what would i get by saving face in a online community. I just care for quality encodes. You can fuck off assuming thing about others.

4)i see you defending judas a lot but I don't see you when you they make statements like "improved banding on beatrice encode" or "domestic kanajo will be same size as beatrice". Pretty sure you are biased so go hang with your gang before preaching.

1. Meme slang, my boy
2. Good news, Einstein: vsedit has a green tint. Use a video player, or even Aegisub. You can keep denying that you did anything wrong outside of this instance, but you ain't convincing anyone lol. The screenshots are taken from your comparisons and from Judas' encode. Put 2 and 2 together and realize that either you fucked up somewhere in your process, or you got caught acting malicious and are just trying to hide it.
3. Because it brings all your other comparisons into question.
4. tfw I almost always shit on Judas' video quality and his subtitle choices. The only times I really "defend" him is when dumbasses make dumb claims.

Even it has green tint how would that effect issues like banding and since both screens are taken from vsedit how does that change things einstein

Yum salted is the best.

Actual Moozzi2 (Unfiltered) and Judas comparison, let your eyes do the thing: https://slow.pics/c/rwXLaVXA

domestic kanajo will be same size as beatrice

I said that because it's true, Beatrice encode of it is 5.8 GB, and most Judas batches are around the same size. We don't run an automated script to CRF 18 every show we encode, so if we ever did Domekano it would be CRF 14 - 16, which would come out to be around the same filesize as Beatrice. Reminder that domekano BDs are 4.5GB/episode unlike the usual 7GB and it's also heavily compressible

@SeaSmoke i have never seen judas go higher than 18 crf on anything. So you understand how that would be absurd statement. Also wouldn't that defeat the purpose you being a mini encode group. Also judas batches are generally 3-4gb for 12 eps.

Well afaik we haven't actually done a show like that, which is why we never had to go below it. CRF 18 usually ends up somewhere in the 400MB range which is why we don't go below it, but if we can go below it and still keep it under 400MB, we definitely would do that.
Basically, Beatrice ended up doing a mini encode because the show is easy to compress even at lower CRF, and Judas doesn't usually do shows when there's another release at under 5 - 6 ish GB.
Now don't assume that I'm saying Beatrice is a mini encode group. They aren't, but domekano is the kind of show which will be smol even at higher quality.

(I'm really horrible at explaining shit, just see Jensen's explanation in their comments.)

@SeaSmoke beatrice isn't mini. Its a proper encode. Crf is more important in deciding whether something is mini or not than size of encode. So if you were to go to crf 14 it wouldn't be a mini but a proper encode which would go against the purpose of your group. Since as you say source is compressible why are you fixed on it being 400 mb?

Sankyuu for Noragami batch ^^
I love hiyori 0w0

Crf is more important in deciding whether something is mini or not than size of encode.

Yeah, that's where you're wrong. For us and afaik every other encoder, a mini encode is one which is somewhere in the 200 - 500 MB range. There's no exact definition on what is a mini encode and what isn't, but CRF isn't everything. A CRF 19 encode of Tensei Shitara Slime first episode is like, 1.7 GB. There's no way in hell you can call that a mini encode.

if you were to go to crf 14 it wouldn’t be a mini but a proper encode which would go against the purpose of your group

So we can't do a proper encode if we want to and it's within the filesize standards of our group? Not trying to be rude, but you're no one to tell us what we can or cannot do.

A CRF 19 encode of Tensei Shitara Slime first episode is like, 1.7 GB.

1st ep of slime is an exception rest of the series compresses pretty well and since its only the 1st ep something there must be in source to justify that.

So we can’t do a proper encode if we want to and it’s within the filesize standards of our group

You can but as i said it would defeat your purpose because a proper encode already exists.

Fonts weren't muxed, gonna wait for v2.

because a proper encode already exists.

...which is exactly why I said (in my original post) that we probably won't be doing it and it's better to grab beatrice. Why are you trying to argue with me and also prove me right at the same time?

1st ep of slime is an exception

And the entire season 1 of Domekano is an exception in a similar way. Slime is far too hard to compress, so there's no point trying to make it small, Domekano is far too easy to compress, so there's no reason to not use low CRF. One could use CRF 18 and make it super small, but does anyone need that? People who download our releases are okay with downloading 300 - 500MB/episode, so if we can make better quality encodes within that filesize, why should we stop and think "Oh wait, we're using CRF 14, that's Beatrice level. Let's make 100MB CRF 20 episodes to compete with animepahe and other streaming sites."

@SeaSmoke what i am trying to say is that anyone downloading judas is not looking for quality. Not trying to be rude but its pretty obvious that your quality is similar to most other mini encode groups that do encodes in your size range. People who download proper encodes won't bother with your encodes unless quality is very good and proper encode is not available.

Let’s make 100MB CRF 20 episodes to compete with animepahe and other streaming sites

Never said that you could probably achieve good result with 17-18 crf for a mini

I like arigato more than arogato. Thanks anyways judas Group! :)

You're welcome :)

@KintokiSakata, nobody cares about what you have to say. Your comments are now all worthless because you repeatedly posted fake image comparisons to make Judas encodes look worse than they are.

@notrem i stand by the fact that this is the only time mistake has been made.

Your so called "fact" was proven wrong by LightArrowsEXE above.

@notrem green tint doesn't affect the issues i was pointing out that were wrong with the encode. I would be happy to do another comparison by providing pics taken using mpv or vlc if you want. Also if my pics were wrong then why wasn't it pointed out in the last encode or encode before. Fact is this mistake was used as opportunity to discredit previous pics. Anyway even you could check by downloading the two encodes.

green tint doesn’t affect the issues i was pointing out that were wrong with the encode

The issue is your screenshots have increased banding.

I would be happy to do another comparison by providing pics taken using mpv or vlc if you want

Nobody wants your fake comparisons.

Also if my pics were wrong then why wasn’t it pointed out in the last encode or encode before

Nobody expected someone to fake comparisons, and it was merely assumed to be genuine.

Fact is this mistake was used as opportunity to discredit previous pics.

No, the fact the previous pics are also fabricated is whats being used to discredit those.

Anyway even you could check by downloading the two encodes.

I did, your screenshots have increased banding.

The issue is your screenshots have increased banding.

Lmao so you think i fabricated banding lol. How is that even possible.

nobody wants your fake comparison

They are not fake i already told how i took the screens. If you use vsedit you will the get the same screens. Heck even frame number is mentioned so there is no confusion.

Nobody expected someone to fake comparisons, and it was merely assumed to be genuine.

Encoder would know since he has the file. He could have posted those frames easily.

No, the fact the previous pics are also fabricated is whats being used to discredit those.

Nice calling something "fact" without evidence

I did, your screenshots have increased banding.

Post the screens then lmao. If you are not happy with my pics then post yours to counter them.

Lmao so you think i fabricated banding lol. How is that even possible.

Lowering bitdepth without dithering is one way, but there are many others..

They are not fake i already told how i took the screens. If you use vsedit you will the get the same screens. Heck even frame number is mentioned so there is no confusion.

If they weren't fake then they wouldn't differ to the actual encode.

Encoder would know since he has the file. He could have posted those frames easily.

This is not even relevant to this discussion, it's not my fault the encoder didnt pickup on your bullshit.

Nice calling something “fact” without evidence

Are genuine screenshots not evidence?

Post the screens then lmao. If you are not happy with my pics then post yours to counter them.

Sure, have another comp: https://slow.pics/c/ipaG5noW

Sure, have another comp: https://slow.pics/c/ipaG5noW

Why are you comparing screens when you are not taking both with vsedit. Take a screen from judas and same screen from cbm and lets see which has more banding using the same software.

Also what about the fps issue mentioned funny no one mentions that.

Why are you comparing screens when you are not taking both with vsedit.

Theres 0 reason to use VSEdit for screens compared to MPV.

Take a screen from judas and same screen from cbm and lets see which has more banding using the same software.

I'm proving your screens as fake by comparing the real frame with your screeenshot. CBM vs Judas has absolutely nothing to do with this

Also what about the fps issue mentioned funny no one mentions that.

Yeah, because its not relevant. Why would I be talking about framerate when proving your comparisons as fake?

Theres 0 reason to use VSEdit for screens compared to MPV.

I didn't know that vsedit had green tint. So if the software is causing the issues then cbm release will also have that same effect in screenshot. Compare my screen with cbm release and i think same effect will exist in that.

I’m proving your screens as fake by comparing the real frame with your screeenshot. CBM vs Judas has absolutely nothing to do with this

You are proving nothing but my ignorance to fact that vsedit has a green tint and as said above you can check my screen against cbm and it will have the same effect and will prove that this fabricating nonsense is false but you are unwilling to do that. Also my original problem with judas release was the fact that it had more banding then cbm.

Side note you seem awfully lot like lightarrows himself but i doubt he would be so petty as to make a alt but then again this is a man that casually told someone to off himself so idk maybe enjoying with the "gang"

btw @KintokiSakata, it's actually possible for screenshots to have more banding due to improper dithering etc. I've noticed it with some video players, and it's even more pronounced on mobile video players

You are proving nothing but my ignorance to fact that vsedit has a green tint

Green tint does not explain increased banding.

So if the software is causing the issues then cbm release will also have that same effect in screenshot. Compare my screen with cbm release and i think same effect will exist in that.

Once again, CBM vs Judas is not relevant at all. The Judas screenshots were faked and thats all I'm trying to show here

Also my original problem with judas release was the fact that it had more banding then cbm.

The more banding you've shown was added by yourself though.

Side note you seem awfully lot like lightarrows himself but i doubt he would be so petty as to make a alt but then again this is a man that casually told someone to off himself so idk maybe enjoying with the “gang”

Not sure what to say about this besides just plainly laughing at you.

Lightarrows is far too lazy to even bother making an alt to post comments. Besides, he's made it clear that he doesn't give a shit about what he says so why would he bother hiding behind an alt lol

@noterm ill explain to you in the most basic way possible okay so try to follow. As you are accusing me of fabricating screens with an agenda against judas then the cbm screens shall not suffer from such fabrication and hence you can prove once and for all that i was fabricating. If the cbm screens does suffer from fabrication it can mean two things 1)it was the software that i was using that caused this and since both screens are suffering from the same effects the comparisons are fair. 2)i was fabricating cbm release with too which idk what reason you will find for me but take your time and come up with an excuse for that. Okay thay should clear things up for you. Fact is only thing you have proven is that my way of taking screens might be wrong but if the effect applies to both then its still a fair comparison.

CBM vs Judas is not relevant at all

Nice try to scoot over the fact that cbm is much superior release than judas one. Comparison or what not nobody has yet said the fact that was my original intention on promare post was that cbm release was superior.

Lightarrows is far too lazy to even bother making an alt to post comments. Besides, he’s made it clear that he doesn’t give a shit about what he says so why would he bother hiding behind an alt lol

Sure i will believe you since you are part of his "gang". Very convincing. I just said what i thought based on his writing style and comparison presentation.

Nice try to scoot over the fact that cbm is much superior release than judas one. Comparison or what not nobody has yet said the fact that was my original intention on promare post was that cbm release was superior.

I know its superior, but that doesn't mean your comparisons weren't fake.

Sure i will believe you since you are part of his “gang”. Very convincing. I just said what i thought based on his writing style and comparison presentation.

lol