Nyaa archive 1140896

[MTBB] Zombie Land Saga | Zombieland Saga - Volume 1 (BD 844p)

Saved on 2019-08-12 16:15:37. This copy includes the description and comments available at capture.

Submitter
motbob
Category
Anime - English-translated
Published
2019-05-04 16:12:48
Size
1.9 GiB
Info hash
08ba16cd280ced48449b39b4ddba3bdfad4ce393
Information
#MTBB on Rizon
Source flags
Trusted

Description

Zombie Land Saga

Vivid subs. I wish there were a way to make this torrent show up in both a search for "Zombie Land" and a search for "Zombieland" without resorting to a terribly awkward title.

Please leave feedback in the comments, good or bad.
It is recommended that you use mpv, or MPC-HC with XySubFilter or AssFilterMod, to watch this and other releases of mine.
Anyone wanting to do their own release is free to use any part of this torrent without permission or credit.

Comments 16

Any differences in Vivid’s subtitles or is it just the meme res encode?

Not really. The script and TS is pretty much untouched (I fixed some TS but didn't do the signs Vivid gave up on). There's some various minor stuff that you won't notice but might make the viewing experience better.

"IN MOVIES AND TV SHOWS
Now, its importance with smaller text is undeniable, but what about with movies? 4:2:0 subsampling has been an industry standard for a long time now, and it isn't without reason. The benefits of having full color in video are debatable, especially at 4k. It would be tough to recognize the difference between a full 4:4:4 sequence and the same content in 4:2:0.

4:2:0 is almost lossless visually, which is why it can be found used in Blu-ray discs and a lot of modern video cameras. There is virtually no advantage to using 4:4:4 for consuming video content. If anything, it would raise the costs of distribution by far more than its comparative visual impact. This becomes especially true as we move towards 4k and beyond. The higher the resolution and pixel density of future displays, the less apparent subsampling artifacts become."

https://www.rtings.com/tv/learn/chroma-subsampling

The person writing that article is making way too broad of a statement. Obviously the difference made by using 4:4:4 in a 540p BD encode is night and day, so there are at least some situations where using 4:4:4 is necessary.

This encode probably isn't one of them, though. Obviously it would be stupid to use 4:4:4 for, say, a theoretical 1050p encode--you'd be upscaling the chroma fields to like 3.8x the pixels just to preserve a little bit of data. But it would be similarly stupid to use 4:2:0 for, say, 560p, where 4:4:4 would be a small upscale to save a lot of chroma data.

So every encoder needs to have some line in their head as to where it stops making sense to use 4:4:4. For me, that line is right before 810p.

Yeah I think the writer was mostly talking in context to FHD and UHD content, since that website focuses mostly on TV reviews, which in modern day are FHD and UHD. I only posted it because it seemed like some people had the mindset that 4:4:4 was inherently better than 4:2:2 or 4:2:0 in all scenarios (which I guess it is but not without tradeoff). Or maybe I just got trolled, hard to tell here.