nekoBT archive 10183987420673
[BlackRabbit] Solo Leveling (2024) - S02 v2 [Bluray-1080p][Opus 2.0][Dual Audio][AV1]
Saved on 2026-09-19 12:23:29. This copy includes the description and comments available at capture.
Description
Release Information
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| File | Solo Leveling (2024) - S02E01 - You Arent E-Rank Are You [Bluray-1080p][Opus 2.0][AV1]-BlackRabbit.mkv |
| Source | WAP |
| File Size | 332 MiB |
| Duration | 23 min 42 s |
| Overall Bitrate | 1 959 kb/s |
| Frame Rate | 23.976 FPS |
| Encoder | RabbitEncoder v2.1.0 |
Video
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Codec | AV1 |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Bitrate | 1 494 kb/s |
| Frame Rate | 23.976 (24000/1001) FPS (Constant) |
| Bit Depth | 10 bits |
| Stream Size | 253 MiB (76%) |
| Encoder | SVT-AV1-Essential v4.0.1 |
| Encoding Settings | --progress 0 --speed slow --quality medium --config /data/temp/d74150e8/abe_temp/source_video_zones.cfg |
Audio
| # | Language | Codec | Channels | Bitrate | Sample Rate | Size | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Japanese | Opus | 2 channels (L R) | 123 kb/s | 48.0 kHz | 20.8 MiB (6%) | Default |
| 2 | English | Opus | 2 channels (L R) | 122 kb/s | 48.0 kHz | 20.6 MiB (6%) | Default |
| 3 | Korean | Opus | 2 channels (L R) | 122 kb/s | 48.0 kHz | 20.7 MiB (6%) | Default |
Subtitles
| # | Title | Format | Language | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Full Subtitles | ASS | English | Default |
| 2 | Signs & Songs | ASS | English | Forced |
BlackRabbit Encodes
BlackRabbit focuses on mini encodes made for users who want to save storage space without giving up solid video and audio quality.
Our goal is simple: find the best available remux source, preferably with dual audio (Japanese + English) when possible, and encode it into:
- Video: AV1
- Audio: Opus
This makes the releases especially useful for people running automated setups such as Sonarr, where smaller file sizes can save a lot of storage over time.
Our Encoding Approach
We generally do not make unnecessary changes. The aim is to keep everything as close to the source as possible, with only these main differences:
- video is encoded to AV1
- audio is encoded to Opus
- overall file size is significantly smaller
In other words, the release should remain effectively the same as the source, just in a more storage-efficient format.
Source Quality
Source quality is very important to us. If a better remux/source becomes available later, we may re-encode the entire season using that source and increase the version number.
If you know of a better source, please let us know in the comments.
Sonarr Compatibility
Compatibility with automated media systems, especially Sonarr, is one of our main priorities. Because of that, we try to keep file names as Sonarr-compatible as possible to make library management easier and more reliable.
Our Priority
Our main goal is to provide mini AV1 encodes for as many anime as possible while still maintaining good video and audio quality.
When strong AV1 releases from other groups are already available, we would generally recommend using those instead. BlackRabbit's focus is on helping fill the gaps by providing compact, high-quality AV1 encodes across a wide range of titles.
Optional Support
If you would like to support and help us continue releasing mini AV1 encodes, donations are appreciated but never expected.
XMR: 895pWQCwjJs24bjnkY5SuhAvwjhKtcrL9NXx1aRy7MUbbSk8w7SawbTiRipPvcmKohQNqpNWXDypmHncLSCxzUtkERNJS9h
Feedback is always welcome. If you spot a better source, naming issue, or anything else worth improving, let us know in the comments.
Comments 2
What does this version bring that the other didn't?
@Oak SeaDex currently considers WAP the best source for Solo Leveling S02. I also asked directly in the SeaDex Discord whether WAP was better than VALKYRiE, and the answer was yes. Their source listing reflects the same conclusion: https://releases.moe/176496/
Rather than second-guessing that assessment ourselves, I think it is better to rely on SeaDex for source comparisons. They are already doing the detailed pixel-level evaluation needed to determine the best release. If their conclusion changes in the future, we can always revisit it and do a new re-encode.
That way, we can stay focused on encoding instead of splitting effort between encoding and source evaluation.